Climate Change vs. Global Warming

Global warming and climate change are sciences odd couple — you hardly hear one mentioned without the other. But much like the confusion that surrounds climate science, this pair is often misunderstood and misused. Lets take a look at what each of these two terms really means, and how (even though theyre often used as synonyms) theyre in fact two very different events. The incorrect interpretation of climate change: A change (usually an increase) in our planets air temperatures. Climate Change Is Non-specific The true definition of climate change is just as it sounds, a change in long-term weather trends — be that rising temperatures, cooling temperatures, changes in precipitation, or what have you. By itself, the phrase carries no presumptions about how the climate is changing, only that a change is occurring. Whats more, these changes could be the result of natural external forces (like an increase or decrease in solar sunspot or Milankovitch Cycles); natural internal processes (like volcanic eruptions or changes in ocean circulations); or human-caused or anthropogenic effects (like the burning of fossil fuels). Again, the phrase climate change doesnt specify the reason for the change. The incorrect interpretation of global warming: Warming due to a human-induced increase in greenhouse gas emissions (like carbon dioxiode). Global Warming Is One Type of Climate Change Global warming describes an increase in Earths average temperature over time. It doesnt mean that temperatures will rise by the same amount everywhere. Neither does it mean that everywhere in the world will get warmer (some locations may not). It simply means that when you consider the Earth as a whole, its average temperature is increasing. This increase could be due to natural or unnatural forces such as an increase in greenhouse gases, particularly from the burning of fossil fuels. Accelerated warming can be measured in Earths atmosphere and oceans. Evidence for global warming can be seen in retreating ice caps, dry lakes, increased habitat reduction for animals (think of the now-infamous polar bear on a lone iceberg), global temperature rises, shifts in weather, coral bleaching, sea-level rise and more. Why People Mix Them Up If climate change and global warming are two very different things, why do we use them interchangeably? Well, when we talk about climate change were usually referring to global warming because our planet is currently experiencing climate change in the form of rising temperatures. And as we know from monikers like FLOTUS and Kimye, the media loves blending words together. Its easier to use climate change and global warming as synonyms (even if it is scientifically incorrect!) than it is to say both. Perhaps climate change and global warming will get its own portmanteau in the near future? How does clowarming sound? The Correct Verbiage If you want to be scientifically correct when talking climate topics, you should say that Earths climate is changing in the form of global warming. According to scientists, it is highly likely that both are being driven by unnatural, human-caused reasons.

How Technology Affects The Development Of Young Students

Introduction Imagine a kindergarten classroom where students are interacting with computers and tablets rather than teachers and peers. Imagine students that are dependent upon technology to learn and interact. How would this educational approach affect child development? Will this change the way humans interact, problem-solve, communicate, and think? In today’s society, there has been a significant advancement in technology use. The evolving times have created a push towards the implementation of technology in all aspects of our lives. Included in this move toward a technologically advanced society is our education system. Recently, there is such a trend toward increased tablet and computer integration in the classroom. There are many arguments for and against the implementation of tablet and computer use within the classroom and how it affects the development of the child. An extremely important goal of kindergarten education is the development of a child both emotionally and socially. With the introduction of technology in the classroom, this paper will explore the impact it plays on the social development of young students. Specifically, what are the effects of tablets and computers in the kindergarten classroom on peer interaction? This paper will look at social-emotional development and peer interaction in kindergarten, the integration of tablets and computers in the classroom, and the effects of tablets and computers on peer interaction. Throughout this paper,Show MoreRelatedEarly Childhood Technologies Used Literacy Instruction And Affect Literacy Development1061 Words   |  5 PagesTechnology ( ages three to six years) Three early childhood technologies used to enhance literacy instruction and affect literacy development. Innovation in the classroom is an extraordinary approach to help understudies take part in the classroom exercises in this manner giving a fun learning climate. It helps instructors with customizing learning instruments to help better serve the understudies needs. Direction innovation in the classroom helps inspiration, higher discriminating deduction andRead MoreTechnology Is Common, New Thinking Is Rare885 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"New technology is common, new thinking is rare.† –Sir Peter Blake The Millennial and Z Generation have had access to new electronics and gadgets that other generations never dreamt possible. As new affordable electronic devices are being designed, public school systems are allowing the new equipment into the classroom. Instructors use certain electronics to teach lessons, practice literary activities, and simply for educational games. However, young children with developing brains should not beRead MoreThe Effects Of Computers On Children s Early Childhood Education Essay1737 Words   |  7 PagesIn today’s world it is nearly impossible to keep up without technology. Computers especially, are needed in most American’s everyday lives. So why would early childhood education be any different? From the beginning stages, there has always been a debate of whether computers have a positive or negative impact on children, young children especially. As computers have intergraded themselves into many children’s lives and their education , the debate is even more prominent. Supporters of computer useRead MoreNegative Effects Of Social Media On Youth1088 Words   |  5 Pagesfocus, social media may not be the saving grace we are looking for. The wide spread use of social media has detrimental effects on the development of today’s youth. The detrimental effects social media has on today’s youth should make us rethink our evolution of technology. The repeated use of social media is harmful to youth because it doesn’t allow for the development of soft skills. An elucidation of soft skills would be personal attributes that enable someone to interact effectively and harmoniouslyRead MoreThe Effects Of Technology On Developing Child1433 Words   |  6 PagesThe Effects of Technology on the Developing Child Technology has transformed society and has become an important part in daily life in various forms, such as television, cell phones and computers. It has eased numerous tasks and issues in the educational, medical and engineering fields. It has also provided a means of communication to contact people around the world without difficulty. As society evolved and more technologies were developed to support the changes, parents depended more on these technologiesRead MoreKids And Technology : How Young Is Too Young?847 Words   |  4 PagesKids and Technology: How Young is Too Young? Every day, the Generation Z/Boomlets, those born after 2001, are starting to interact more and more with technological devices. This can cause very serious consequences and it can affect their development, such as irregular sleeping pattern, lack empathy, social and language skills and health issues. The Common Sense organization did some research and discovered that 10 percent of one year olds have used a technology device. They also found out that 38Read MoreThe Effects Of Technology On Technology1220 Words   |  5 Pagesbecome more and more dependent on technology. I myself have watched it invade my home and become an essential part of my life. Almost every household in the United States in connected to social media in some way. Many of us have become so dependent on it that we feel like we’ve lost a part of ourselves when we lose out phones. Technology has given us the power to make major leaps in medicine, communication and entertainment. With all of this wonderful new technology it makes me wonder, is it affectingRead MoreTechnology And Its Harm To Future Generations Essay1067 Words   |  5 PagesTechnology And Its Harm To future Generations Will the usage of computers in a classroom setting result in adverse effects on young future generations? No doubt, for years has this been an ongoing argument concerning the educational system. Because computer use is promoted in schools, and because computers are so ubiquitous, children have a great deal of exposure to them. Not everyone, however, is comfortable with the use of computers by young children. Educators, Professors, Parents, and SchoolRead MoreSpeech : A Speech Disorder Essay1615 Words   |  7 PagesOver the history of our world, speech impediments affect many different people. Most of the time, individuals do not even realize the person they are speaking with has a speech disorder. This disorder even impacts icons including Greek philosopher Aristotle, physicist Isaac Newton, singer Elvis Presley, golfer Tiger Woods and actor Bruce Willis. However, one story that stands out involves Kind George VI of England. In his early childhood the prince acquired a stammer; no w known mostly as a stutterRead MoreLiteracy Influences Child Development, Social Interaction And Development Of The Brain978 Words   |  4 PagesLiteracy influences child development, social interaction and the ability to overcome obstacles a positive aspect. If you are reading this, at some point in time someone, somewhere taught you to read. Literacy in small children can be very beneficial to the growth and development of the brain. â€Å"Decades of research prove that when young children are surrounded by literature-rich environments are spoken to and read to frequently, have the skills needed to start school and are appropriately supported

Spanish and English Motives for Settling America Free Essays

AP US History 1 July 2011 In the early fourteenth century, the Americas were home to natives who had lived there for centuries. They had created entire cities for places of worship. These cities were occupied by skilled mathematicians, architects, and astronomers. We will write a custom essay sample on Spanish and English Motives for Settling America or any similar topic only for you Order Now Thought they did make human sacrifices to their many gods, the natives were able to control their empire and keep it alive at least until the arrival of the European. On the other side of the world, Europeans were looking for opportunities of freedom, land, goods, and most of all riches. There was a high competition for the desired goods of India and China so Europeans began to search for easier routes that would bring them wealth. Spain was the first to discover and claim the Southwest Americas with the historical voyage of Christopher Columbus. Then a couple of years later, had John Cabot claimed the Northeast Americas for England. The Spanish and English differed in motives and benefits from the settlements that they had created in the seventeenth century because of how they treated the natives, colonized, and reasons of leaving Europe. The Spanish were thirsty for riches. Their main reason for leaving Europe was because of God, glory, and gold. Christopher Columbus’s accidental discovery had provided the right opportunity for the Spanish to achieve their goals. The natives welcomed the Spanish into their cities because they thought they were gods. When the Spanish discovered the vast amounts of gold in the area, they decided to conquer the lands and to gain riches and glory. Many natives died from the wars with the Spanish, but what really killed them was disease. Later on as the Spanish colonized southwest America, they brought Christianity to the natives. Missionaries tried to Europeanize the natives. Many Spanish men married native women and had European American children. In New England, the English colonies had different motives. Theirs was religious freedom. At first the natives and the English made peace treaties because of trade and Christianity. But as time passed tensions grew. The English did not intermix with the natives as the Spanish had. The natives were mainly a pestilence that was in the way of land. As with the Spanish, the natives had their populations wiped out because of European diseases and wars. The natives were forced to combine with other tribes and move to the Midwest. The Spanish settled the southwest Americas and the Caribbean. In the New Mexico and Texas areas of present day America, they found little success in their search for gold. They found the Caribbean useful for the crop plantations of tobacco, sugar, and corn. The Spanish spread Christianity to the natives, built forts and missions, and claimed the land for Spain for centuries to come. The Spanish planted their teachings, language, laws, and religion into their colonies and native neighbors. New England had been settled for the land and freedom it offered. Thousands of miles away from England, the Europeans were able to find comfort in freedom of religion. As colonies grew, things started to change. The colonist both fought with each other over land and religion. Government was made up and some of these written laws were placed in today’s constitution. Major cash crops were grown and the colonies grew also. Africans were shipped to New England as slaves to help maintain these large farms. New Englanders started out on a difficult journey but life continued to get better as the colonies grew. The Spanish and English both wanted to find easier routes to the Indies. They wanted the spices and other luxury goods the Asia had to offer. There were high competitions and everyone wanted a part in the wealth and adventure exploration offered. When the Spanish discovered America, they took the land and colonized it. Americas was rich in soil, minerals, and goods. This was a way for Spain to become a more powerful nation, so the Spanish seized their opportunity. The English on the other hand, wanted freedom form religious persecution and they wanted a bigger kingdom. The land was excellent for the planting of crops and offered the chance for people to get rich. Both the Spanish and English had different motives and benefits from their settlement of the Americas. They found success in many areas of the land that they settled. They made laws, discovered new places, and claimed a land for their mother nations. The English and Spanish were the biggest land owners of the Americas. Though some of their intentions were selfish, they played a major part in creating what is now the United States. How to cite Spanish and English Motives for Settling America, Essay examples Spanish and English Motives for Settling America Free Essays AP US History 1 July 2011 In the early fourteenth century, the Americas were home to natives who had lived there for centuries. They had created entire cities for places of worship. These cities were occupied by skilled mathematicians, architects, and astronomers. We will write a custom essay sample on Spanish and English Motives for Settling America or any similar topic only for you Order Now Thought they did make human sacrifices to their many gods, the natives were able to control their empire and keep it alive at least until the arrival of the European. On the other side of the world, Europeans were looking for opportunities of freedom, land, goods, and most of all riches. There was a high competition for the desired goods of India and China so Europeans began to search for easier routes that would bring them wealth. Spain was the first to discover and claim the Southwest Americas with the historical voyage of Christopher Columbus. Then a couple of years later, had John Cabot claimed the Northeast Americas for England. The Spanish and English differed in motives and benefits from the settlements that they had created in the seventeenth century because of how they treated the natives, colonized, and reasons of leaving Europe. The Spanish were thirsty for riches. Their main reason for leaving Europe was because of God, glory, and gold. Christopher Columbus’s accidental discovery had provided the right opportunity for the Spanish to achieve their goals. The natives welcomed the Spanish into their cities because they thought they were gods. When the Spanish discovered the vast amounts of gold in the area, they decided to conquer the lands and to gain riches and glory. Many natives died from the wars with the Spanish, but what really killed them was disease. Later on as the Spanish colonized southwest America, they brought Christianity to the natives. Missionaries tried to Europeanize the natives. Many Spanish men married native women and had European American children. In New England, the English colonies had different motives. Theirs was religious freedom. At first the natives and the English made peace treaties because of trade and Christianity. But as time passed tensions grew. The English did not intermix with the natives as the Spanish had. The natives were mainly a pestilence that was in the way of land. As with the Spanish, the natives had their populations wiped out because of European diseases and wars. The natives were forced to combine with other tribes and move to the Midwest. The Spanish settled the southwest Americas and the Caribbean. In the New Mexico and Texas areas of present day America, they found little success in their search for gold. They found the Caribbean useful for the crop plantations of tobacco, sugar, and corn. The Spanish spread Christianity to the natives, built forts and missions, and claimed the land for Spain for centuries to come. The Spanish planted their teachings, language, laws, and religion into their colonies and native neighbors. New England had been settled for the land and freedom it offered. Thousands of miles away from England, the Europeans were able to find comfort in freedom of religion. As colonies grew, things started to change. The colonist both fought with each other over land and religion. Government was made up and some of these written laws were placed in today’s constitution. Major cash crops were grown and the colonies grew also. Africans were shipped to New England as slaves to help maintain these large farms. New Englanders started out on a difficult journey but life continued to get better as the colonies grew. The Spanish and English both wanted to find easier routes to the Indies. They wanted the spices and other luxury goods the Asia had to offer. There were high competitions and everyone wanted a part in the wealth and adventure exploration offered. When the Spanish discovered America, they took the land and colonized it. Americas was rich in soil, minerals, and goods. This was a way for Spain to become a more powerful nation, so the Spanish seized their opportunity. The English on the other hand, wanted freedom form religious persecution and they wanted a bigger kingdom. The land was excellent for the planting of crops and offered the chance for people to get rich. Both the Spanish and English had different motives and benefits from their settlement of the Americas. They found success in many areas of the land that they settled. They made laws, discovered new places, and claimed a land for their mother nations. The English and Spanish were the biggest land owners of the Americas. Though some of their intentions were selfish, they played a major part in creating what is now the United States. How to cite Spanish and English Motives for Settling America, Papers

Illicit Trade in Art and Antiquities †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Illicit Trade in Art and Antiquities. Answer: Introduction: The main issue of the case whether Dora is Delight can claim damage against the Maleny Reception Pty Ltd or not. The present case is based on the parts of negligence. An act that has been stated as negligent act when a person had failed to do certain thing what an ordinary person with prudent mind could do at the same time. The principle of negligence is enlightened under the law of Torts. It is the responsibility of every person to act diligently. However, in certain circumstances, it can be observed that this act of diligences has not been maintained properly. One of the main criteria of negligence is the failure to foresee all the consequences. There are certain elements present under the provinces of negligence. When these elements are fulfilled, it can be stated that negligence has been done. The elements are as follows: It has to be proved that the defendant has a duty as against the plaintiff which has to be taken with great care; It has also to be proved that the duty is being breached by defendant; If the allegations have been proved against the defendant, plaintiff can claim damage; The injury to be foreseeable nature. The legal liability of a defendant to a plaintiff is based on the defendant's failure to fulfil a responsibility, recognised by law, of which the plaintiff is the intended beneficiary (Bigus 2015). The first step in determining the existence of a legally recognised responsibility is the concept of an obligation or duty. In the tort of negligence the term used is duty of care. The case of Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] has established the principle of negligence. It has been proved in this case that the manufacturer owed certain duties as against the plaintiff. Caparo Industries Plc v. Dickman[1990] introduced a 'threefold test' for a duty of care. Harm must be (1) reasonably foreseeable (2) there must be a relationship of proximity between the plaintiff and defendant and (3) it must be 'fair, just and reasonable' to impose liability (Burns 2013). However, these act as guidelines for the courts in establishing a duty of care; much of the principle is still at the discretion of judges. Once it is established that the defendant owed a duty to the plaintiff/claimant, the matter of whether or not that duty was breached must be settled. The test is both subjective and objective. The defendant who knowingly (subjective) exposes the plaintiff/claimant to a substantial risk of loss, breaches that duty (Goold and Maslen 2014). The defendant who fails to realize the substantial risk of loss to the plaintiff/claimant, which anyreasonable person[objective] in the same situation would clearly have realized, also breaches that duty management. Even though there is breach of duty, and the cause of some injury to the defendant, a plaintiff may not recover unless he can prove that the defendant's breach caused a pecuniary injury. This should not be mistaken with the requirements that a plaintiff prove harm to recover. As a general rule, a plaintiff can only rely on a legal remedy to the point that he proves that he suffered a loss; it was reasonably foreseeable (Jacob 2015). It means something more than pecuniary loss is a necessary element of the plaintiff's case in negligence. When damages are not a necessary element, a plaintiff can win his case without showing that he suffered any loss; he would be entitled tonominal damagesand any other damages according to proof. The present case is based on the provision of Civil Liability Act 2003. TheCivil Liability Act 2003contains statutory protection for persons performing voluntary work for community organisations from incurring personal civil liability. It also contains fundamental changes to the common law of negligence. The Act was passed as part of the Queensland Parliament's response to the civil liability and insurance 'crisis'. Many of its initiatives are based on the recommendations of the Review of the Law of Negligence Report. The legislation dealing with the issue of volunteer protection has been passed in every State and Territory in Australia. Legislation has also been passed in the United States that deals with similar issues. Certain provisions of the contributory negligence will also be applicable here. The contributory negligence defence can potentially eliminate the defendant's responsibility to pay damages to an injured plaintiff. For example, apedestriancrosses a road negligently and is hit by a driver who was driving negligently. Since the pedestrian has also contributed to the accident, they may be barred from complete and full recovery of damages from the driver (or their insurer) because the accident was less likely to occur if it hadn't been for their failure to keep a proper lookout (Loss, Seligman and Paredes 2017). Another example of contributory negligence is where a plaintiff actively disregards warnings or fails to take reasonable steps for his or her safety, thenassumes a certain level of riskin a given activity; such as diving in shallow water without checking the depth first. It denotes the liability of the plaintiff in the negligent act. It is a weapon of the defendant as against the p laintiff. There is another thing that can be used as defence for the defendant and that is voluntary assumption of risk. It is a defence in proceedings in negligence for the defendant to prove that the plaintiff fully comprehended the risk of injury that materialised and freely chose to accept it (Lyons 2015). The defence of "voluntary assumption of risk", which is a defence to a claim in negligence, corresponds to the plea of "consent" in actions for intended harm. Both are expressions of the same philosophy of individualism: no wrong is done to one who consents: volenti non fit injuria - "to a willing person, injury is not done." It has been clear from the elements of the negligence that a person can claim damages against any person or authority if it has been proved that the respective person or authority owes certain duty against him. It can be stated that in the present case, the authority of the reception has failed to take care of the tiles and the roof and the rainy weather makes the floor slippery and when Dora went on the floor, she slipped and sustained severe back injury. It is the duty of the reception authority to take care of the event house and they should have to remain liable for anything involves the event house. It has also been observed that the reception authority knows about the fact that the roof has been in a dilapidated condition and it is required to be maintained, but they did not pay any heed to it. It has been witnessed by many employees of the reception authority who had confessed that the floor tiles of the event house were old and the very nature of the tiles makes them slippery. Further, the roof of the veranda was poor and water had swiped away from it and that also responsible to make the floor slippery. It is the duty of the authority to take reasonable care for all this, but they had failed to do it (Price 2013). According to the provisions of Donoghue v Stevenson, the authority is responsible here and can be charged under the breach of duty. In this case, it has also been observed that Dora was drunk that day and it was confessed by her. Another important thing is that prior to the accident, she got slipped slightly and she knew that the floor is slippery. Therefore, she knew that the floor can make injury to her. However, after the party when she was went through the floor, she slipped and got injured. It has been held in Smith v Charles Baker (1891) that when the plaintiff invited the risk to be applied on him, and sustain injury regarding the same, such an act of the plaintiff can become a good defence for the defendants. Under the provision of the contributory negligence, if the plaintiff knows that there is certain risks regarding certain acts and still then he try the same and got injured, law will bar him to claim total damage from the defendant for the injury (Sime 2015). This is a well known principle of the contributory negligence. In this case, Dora was drunk at the time of the accident. Moreover, she knew that the floor was slippery. Thus, she needed to be more careful when walking on the floor. However, she did not take much care and fell. Conclusion: Therefore, it can be stated that Dora Delight can claim damage against the reception authority under the act of negligence but she could not claim full damage as she was partly responsible for the injury. Reference: Bigus, J., 2015. Auditor Reputation Under Different Negligence Regimes.Abacus,51(3), pp.356-378. Burns, K., 2013. Its not just policy: The role of social facts in judicial reasoning in negligence cases.Torts Law Journal,21, p.73. Goold, I. and Maslen, H., 2014. Must the surgeon take the pill? Negligence duty in the context of cognitive enhancement.The Modern Law Review,77(1), pp.60-86. Jacob, J., 2015. Innovation in risky industries under liability law: the case of double-impact innovations.Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE,171(3), pp.385-404. Loss, L., Seligman, J. and Paredes, T., 2017.Fundamentals of securities regulation management. Wolters Kluwer. Lyons, A., 2015. Duty of care.Good Practice, (12), p.24. Price, W.N., 2013. Legal implications of an ethical duty to search for genetic incidental findings.The American Journal of Bioethics,13(2), pp.48-49. Shan, W., 2014, April. On the Civil Liability for Acts of Violating Personal Information. In2014 International Conference on Economic Management and Trade Cooperation (EMTC 2014). Atlantis Press. Sime, S., 2015.A practical approach to civil procedure. Oxford University Press, USA. Stickley, A.P., 2016.Australian Torts Law. LexisNexis Butterworths. Stuhmcke, A. and Stewart, P., 2014. Lacunae and Litigants: A Study of Negligence Cases in the High Court of Australia in the First Decade of the 21st Century and Beyond. Ulph, J. and Smith, I., 2015.The illicit trade in art and antiquities: international recovery and criminal and civil liability. Bloomsbury Publishing.